Also from the developer: Travel Vista

The TA guide

How to run a course's marks and evaluations on nuSkor — efficiently, correctly, and without becoming your students' search engine.

Last updated: October 2026 · nuSkor is an independent student-built project — not affiliated with any university.

Teaching assistants hold a course together between lectures: marks get graded, totals get tracked, evaluations get scheduled, and questions get answered. This guide is about doing that work once instead of three times — the workflow patterns that keep a semester calm, written for the way courses actually run.

Set-up week: the 30 minutes that save the semester

The most valuable TA session of the semester is the first one. Create the assessments with their exact names, totals and weightages while the course outline is open in front of you — every downstream total computes itself from this one transcription. Decide the evaluation plan early too: how many slots, where, and whether students can rebook. A five-line announcement that closes with “details are on the portal” replaces fifty replies.

Weekly rhythm: enter, verify, publish

  • Enter marks in batches. Small checkers go in by hand; anything that reached a spreadsheet goes through CSV import, which validates every row against the roster before saving. Flagged rows mean typos, not mysteries.
  • Verify before publishing. Marks stay invisible to students until you publish. Do the totals read sensibly? Any suspiciously uniform scores? Ten seconds of scepticism per batch outlives ten messages per student.
  • Publish, then announce deliberately. One announcement stating what was published and what students should check, instead of the information leaking unevenly through the week.

Evaluations: make the roster build itself

Open the slot grid with a deadline for booking and let the class self-serve. The database enforces one booking per student and prevents collisions, which removes the two failure modes that eat evaluation weeks: double-booked slots and “I asked in the chat first”. On the day, bring the portal’s roster view — who is next, with their booking timestamps — and the session runs on rails.

The golden rule of TA communication

Say it once, in a place everyone will look, and point at it afterwards. The announcements feed plus the marksheet answers the questions you would otherwise answer individually.

Corrections and disputes, handled calmly

  • Correct through the system. Fix the entry, republish, and everyone downstream sees the corrected version. No errata threads.
  • Keep a consistent standard. Apply the rubric (or marking scheme) the same way across the batch; students compare, and consistency is the fairness they can see.
  • Route policy questions upward. Attendance rules, extensions, exam eligibility — these belong to the instructor or the institution, not your inbox. A polite redirect protects both your time and the course’s consistency.

End of semester: the quiet payoff

Because the record was structured from week one, the final audits are painless: totals compute themselves, the history of what was published when is already there, and the students who checked the evaluation checklist arrived ready. Compare that to the spreadsheet-and-chat semester — and decide which one to sign up for again. The for TAs page has the workflow overview; this guide is the operating manual.

Frequently asked questions

How early should marks be published after an assessment?
Sooner is almost always better — ints removed from the anxiety cycle. A useful pattern: enter, verify, publish within days of grading, with one announcement. Oscar-worthy delays only generate email.
What if two TAs grade differently?
Calibrate before grading: mark a handful of scripts together and align on the rubric's application. After that, spot-check each other's batches. The portal records who entered what, which makes buddy-checking easy.
How do I handle a student disputing a mark?
Check the entry against the source first — simple typos happen and are quick to fix. If the mark was applied per the scheme, show the working; if it was wrong, correct it and republish. Document the decision in your own notes either way.

Running a course this semester?

Sign in as a TA to reach your sections — marks entry, CSV import, evaluation slots and announcements in one workflow.

Login as Student